KSEBOA - KSEB Officers' Association

Friday
May 26th
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home News Power Sector News APERC cant extend deadline for Discoms: High Court

APERC cant extend deadline for Discoms: High Court

PDF
Hits smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
APERCIn a judgement that will have far-reaching consequences, the AP High Court on 20-01-2012 held that the AP Electricity Regulatory Commission could not entertain applications from the power distribution companies (Discoms) to determine Fuel Surcharge Adjustment beyond the time stipulated for the recovery. While allowing a batch of writ appeals filed by High-Tension power consumers, a division bench comprising Chief Justice Madan B. Lokur and Justice P.V. Sanjay Kumar ruled that the claims of the Discoms to recover FAS from HT consumers for the year 2008-09 are time-barred.

This verdict will be welcomed by domestic consumers as the Discoms shocked them with their decision on 17-01-2012, by deciding to recover fuel surcharge for the financial years 2008-09 and 2009- 2010. APERC, the regulatory body, had allowed the Discoms to do so, even though they had filed their applications after the stipulated time of 30 days for every quarter in a year. However, the state government said it was prepared to bear the cost of FSA for domestic consumers for the year 2008-09, but not for 2009-10.

The High Court observed that being an independent body, APERC must balance the interests of consumers with that of Discoms, and recover the costs in a reasonable manner. The commission cannot favour one side as it has chosen to do in the present case, the court observed. The bench made it clear that the commission has no power to extend the time period stipulated in the amended Regulation 45-B (4) of the Business Regulations for recovery of the surcharge. A single judge had earlier found that the commission has the power to extend the time period if it has sufficient reason to do so. But the present bench refuted this finding, and said that the amended Regulation makes it explicit that failure to abide by the time stipulation enjoins forfeiture of future claims by Discoms in that regard.

Source- Deccan chronicle

 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

20-conference
 

Random Videos

You need Flash player 6+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video.
Title: Power Quiz 2015 Final - Part-1

Latest Comments

Banner

Reference Book

 

Reference Book on Power

Electrical Engineering-- D' 1/4 Size Hard bound-- 1424 Pages-- Just Rs.1000/- only &n...

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
mod_vvisit_counterToday1627
mod_vvisit_counterYesterday4897
mod_vvisit_counterThis Month120740
mod_vvisit_counterLast Month152890

Online Visitors: 59
IP: 54.162.44.105
,
Time: 09 : 04 : 05