* Tata Power Trading opposed the move, saying prices had started showing a declining trend and any intervention might affect new investment
* Jindal Power said the company was opposed to any price cap because the market trend indicated declining prices
* Adani Power said price caps should not be imposed, as it might affect competitive rates being discovered in tariff-based bidding
CERC Chairman Pramod Deo told Business Standard that the power regulator was keeping a close watch on electricity prices and no caps had been introduced for the present.
Tata Power Trading, an arm of Tata Power, opposed the move, saying prices had started showing a declining trend and any intervention might affect new investment. In its presentation to the regulator, the company said portfolio sellers were adding to the volumes in the market and, therefore, there should not be any undue concern on their profits.
Jindal Power agreed and said the company was opposed to any price cap because the market trend indicated the declining prices. The company informed CERC that its average selling price in 2009-10 was Rs 5.26 per unit and it had come down to less than Rs 5 in the last six months.
Jindal Power suggested promoting an open access system for increasing the depth of markets and also interventions by State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (SERCs) on procurement of power by distribution licensees.
Adani Power said price caps should not be imposed, as it might affect competitive rates being discovered in tariff-based bidding. The company explained this was so because developers would expect lower income from merchant sales. It said prices in the short-term market were higher because of extra liabilities, like earnest money and letter of credit charges.
Indian Energy Exchange (IEX) also said it was not in favour of price caps. According to IEX, participation of open access consumers is moderating prices in power exchanges. The exchange said there was a need for introducing long-term contracts. IEX suggested the retail rate structure should be such that open access consumers were charged the marginal costs of the utility.
Power Exchange India (PXIL) made a strong pitch for allocation of larger transmission capacities to power exchanges and introduction of term-ahead contracts of longer duration on power exchanges.
PTC India said the short term prices were higher because these were related to firm contracts and distribution companies would prefer such products because no meaningful supply planning could be done on the basis of day-ahead contracts. PTC India suggested CERC should encourage larger investments in merchant capacities.
Source- Business standard